
Background: The safety, diagnostic yield, and long-term prognosis of a type 1 procainamide-induced Brugada pattern are not well understood and may differ from stronger sodium channel blockers. Clinical questions: 1. Is procainamide infusion safe and effective for diagnosing Brugada syndrome? 2. What is the diagnostic yield of a procainamide challenge across different patient groups? 3. What are the long-term arrhythmic outcomes for patients with a procainamide-induced type 1 Brugada pattern compared with those with a spontaneous type 1 pattern? Cohort: 947 consecutive patients from 25 Canadian inherited arrhythmia centers (HiRO registry, 2004–2024) underwent a procainamide challenge; a subset of 137 patients with a procainamide-induced type 1 Brugada pattern was compared with 105 patients with a spontaneous type 1 pattern for long-term outcomes. Main outcomes: Procainamide infusion was extremely safe (0.2% had transient arrhythmias); diagnostic yield varied by indication (7–47%); over