
Background and Purpose: Automated radiotherapy planning seeks to enhance plan quality and efficiency while minimizing inter-planner variability. The Varian Ethos treatment planning system (TPS) utilizes an Intelligent Optimization Engine for template-based planning. Ethos TPS version 2.0 introduces refined optimization strategies; however, its performance in head and neck (H&N) cancer treatment has not been thoroughly evaluated. This study compares dosimetric quality, plan complexity, and deliverability between Ethos TPS v2.0 and v1.1. Materials and Methods: Fifty consecutively treated H&N cancer patients underwent retrospective replanning. Identical, validated optimization templates were applied in both Ethos v1.1 and v2.0. IMRT plans with 7, 9, and 12-field geometries were generated for both versions; 2- and 3-arc VMAT plans were also produced using v2.0. Plan quality was assessed using target coverage, organ-at-risk dose metrics, and monitor units. Plan complexity metrics and measurement-based quality assurance were also evaluated.
1.1 Energy Metabolism in the Brain Although the brain accou...